麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs Cicis Pizza
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 593K installs
VS
Cicis Pizza
Cicis
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 259K installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins
+129% vs other
MAU winner
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins
+209% vs other
Rating winner
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins
+6% vs other
Why 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 has ~593K lifetime installs vs Cicis Pizza's ~259K - 2.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
vs
Cicis Pizza
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
593K
◀
259K
Monthly active users (est.)?
71K
◀
23K
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
4.58★
Total ratings
7K
◀
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 25, 2016
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 111.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.0.33.0
- Languages
- English, Chinese
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 29, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.5.6
- Languages
- -
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 trajectory
Cicis Pizza trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Cicis Pizza? v
Cicis Pizza earns about $0 per month, while 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 ≈ $0/year, Cicis Pizza ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Cicis Pizza? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 leads with about 593K estimated downloads vs 259K for Cicis Pizza - a 2.3× gap. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送's App Store downloads are estimated from 7K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Cicis Pizza reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and Cicis Pizza in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and Cicis Pizza have in-app purchases? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Cicis Pizza does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Cicis Pizza runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Cicis Pizza? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 7K ratings, Cicis Pizza 301 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs Cicis Pizza revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and $0 for Cicis Pizza are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Cicis Pizza to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.