麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs R & G Lounge
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 600K installs
VS
R & G Lounge
Swype Systems Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins
+149920% vs other
MAU winner
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins
+173224% vs other
Rating winner
R & G Lounge wins
+3% vs other
Why 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 has ~600K lifetime installs vs R & G Lounge's ~400 - 1500.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
vs
R & G Lounge
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
600K
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
71K
◀
41.2
App Store rating
4.84★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
8K
◀
4
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 25, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 27, 2026
- File size
- 126.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.0.36.1
- Languages
- English, Chinese
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 19, 2020
- Last updated
- Feb 15, 2025
- File size
- 2.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.2.3
- Languages
- English
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 trajectory
R & G Lounge trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or R & G Lounge? v
R & G Lounge earns about $0 per month, while 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 ≈ $0/year, R & G Lounge ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or R & G Lounge? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 leads with about 600K estimated downloads vs 400 for R & G Lounge - a 1500.2× gap. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送's App Store downloads are estimated from 8K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. R & G Lounge's App Store downloads are estimated from 4 ratings.
Are 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and R & G Lounge in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and R & G Lounge have in-app purchases? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. R & G Lounge does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", R & G Lounge runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or R & G Lounge? v
R & G Lounge edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 8K ratings, R & G Lounge 4 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs R & G Lounge revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and $0 for R & G Lounge are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or R & G Lounge to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.