麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs SlushIQ

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送

McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 600K installs
VS

SlushIQ

Michael Sturgis
App Store
$88/mo
~$1.1K/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner SlushIQ wins +8800% vs other
Installs winner 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins +36259% vs other
MAU winner 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins +35956% vs other
Rating winner SlushIQ wins +3% vs other

Why SlushIQ is winning

Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. SlushIQ earns roughly 88× more per month than 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 - $88 vs $0.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full SlushIQ report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
vs
SlushIQ
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
$88
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
$1.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
600K
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
71K
198
App Store rating
4.84★
4.97★
Total ratings
7K
30
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送

McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jan 25, 2016
Last updated
Jun 27, 2026
File size
126.3 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
7.0.36.1
Languages
English, Chinese
View full 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 report →

SlushIQ

Michael Sturgis
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
USD1.99
Released
Aug 17, 2025
Last updated
Jun 4, 2026
File size
13.9 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
5.2
Languages
English
View full SlushIQ report →

麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

SlushIQ trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or SlushIQ? v
SlushIQ earns about $88 per month, while 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$88 more per month for SlushIQ). Annual revenue: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 ≈ $0/year, SlushIQ ≈ $1.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or SlushIQ? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 leads with about 600K estimated downloads vs 2K for SlushIQ - a 363.6× gap. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送's App Store downloads are estimated from 7K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. SlushIQ's App Store downloads are estimated from 29 ratings.
Are 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and SlushIQ in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and SlushIQ have in-app purchases? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. SlushIQ does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", SlushIQ runs "Paid app ($1.99)".
Which has better ratings, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or SlushIQ? v
SlushIQ edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 7K ratings, SlushIQ 29 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs SlushIQ revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and $88 for SlushIQ are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or SlushIQ to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.