MemoryRevive vs PhotoPills
MemoryRevive
MemoryRevive
Google Play
$13/mo
~$152/yr · 107 installs
VS
PhotoPills
PhotoPills, SL
Google Play
$56.9K/mo
~$683.2K/yr · 432K installs
Revenue winner
PhotoPills wins
+437823% vs other
Installs winner
PhotoPills wins
+403340% vs other
MAU winner
PhotoPills wins
+321307% vs other
Rating winner
PhotoPills wins
+480% vs other
Why PhotoPills is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PhotoPills earns roughly 4379× more per month than MemoryRevive - $56.9K vs $13.
- Bigger install base. PhotoPills has ~432K lifetime installs vs MemoryRevive's ~107 - 4034.4× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. PhotoPills sits at 4.80★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PhotoPills report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MemoryRevive
vs
PhotoPills
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$13
▶
$56.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$152
▶
$683.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
107
▶
432K
Monthly active users (est.)?
32.1
▶
103K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.80★
Total ratings
0
▶
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.78
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 30, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 4, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- May 26, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.8.21
- Languages
- -
MemoryRevive trajectory
PhotoPills trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MemoryRevive or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills earns about $56.9K per month, while MemoryRevive earns about $13. That is a 4379.2× revenue gap (~$56.9K more per month for PhotoPills). Annual revenue: MemoryRevive ≈ $152/year, PhotoPills ≈ $683.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MemoryRevive or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills leads with about 432K estimated downloads vs 107 for MemoryRevive - a 4034.4× gap. MemoryRevive reports 100+ installs on Google Play. PhotoPills reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MemoryRevive and PhotoPills in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MemoryRevive and PhotoPills offer? v
MemoryRevive: IAP range $3.99 - $23.99 per item. PhotoPills: no IAP detected on the public listing. MemoryRevive runs a "Subscription (~$9.78/mo)" monetization model; PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MemoryRevive or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: MemoryRevive 0 ratings, PhotoPills 511 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MemoryRevive vs PhotoPills revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $13 for MemoryRevive and $56.9K for PhotoPills are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MemoryRevive or PhotoPills to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.