MemoryRevive vs Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video
MemoryRevive
MemoryRevive
Google Play
$13/mo
~$152/yr · 107 installs
VS
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video
PicsArt, Inc.
Google Play
$23.70M/mo
~$284.39M/yr · 1.4B installs
Revenue winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+182298154% vs other
Installs winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+1324832576% vs other
MAU winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+158979821% vs other
Rating winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+401% vs other
Why Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video earns roughly 1822983× more per month than MemoryRevive - $23.70M vs $13.
- Premium pricing. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video charges $14.76/mo vs MemoryRevive's $9.78/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video has ~1.4B lifetime installs vs MemoryRevive's ~107 - 13248326.8× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video sits at 4.01★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MemoryRevive
vs
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$13
▶
$23.70M
Annual revenue (est.)
$152
▶
$284.39M
Lifetime installs (est.)
107
▶
1.4B
Monthly active users (est.)?
32.1
▶
51.0M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.01★
Total ratings
0
▶
12.2M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.78
▶
$14.76
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 30, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 4, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 4, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 30.1.12
- Languages
- -
MemoryRevive trajectory
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MemoryRevive or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video earns about $23.70M per month, while MemoryRevive earns about $13. That is a 1822982.5× revenue gap (~$23.70M more per month for Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video). Annual revenue: MemoryRevive ≈ $152/year, Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video ≈ $284.39M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MemoryRevive or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video leads with about 1.4B estimated downloads vs 107 for MemoryRevive - a 13248326.8× gap. MemoryRevive reports 100+ installs on Google Play. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video reports 1,000,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MemoryRevive and Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MemoryRevive and Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video offer? v
MemoryRevive: IAP range $3.99 - $23.99 per item. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video: IAP range $0.99 - $219.99 per item. MemoryRevive runs a "Subscription (~$9.78/mo)" monetization model; Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video runs "Subscription (~$14.76/mo, ai)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MemoryRevive or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.0 stars). Rating volume: MemoryRevive 0 ratings, Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video 443K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MemoryRevive vs Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $13 for MemoryRevive and $23.70M for Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MemoryRevive or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.