Messenger vs QQ

Messenger

Meta Platforms, Inc.
Google Play
$26.42M/mo
~$317.02M/yr · 7.8B installs
VS

QQ

Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Ltd.
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 28.6M installs
Revenue winner Messenger wins +2641818500% vs other
Installs winner Messenger wins +26998% vs other
MAU winner Messenger wins +10298% vs other
Rating winner Messenger wins +170% vs other

Why Messenger is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Messenger earns roughly 26418185× more per month than QQ - $26.42M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Messenger runs a $4.47/mo subscription that compounds; QQ relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Messenger has ~7.8B lifetime installs vs QQ's ~28.6M - 271.0× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Messenger sits at 4.72★ vs 1.75★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Messenger report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Messenger
vs
QQ
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$26.42M
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$317.02M
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
7.8B
28.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
255.9M
2.5M
App Store rating
4.72★
1.75★
Total ratings
111.5M
208K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.47
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Messenger

Meta Platforms, Inc.
Google Play
Category
Communication
Price
Free
Released
Jan 30, 2014
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
559.0.0.49.75
Languages
-
View full Messenger report →

QQ

Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Ltd.
Google Play
Category
Communication
Price
Free
Released
Sep 20, 2011
Last updated
Dec 25, 2020
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
8.2.11
Languages
-
View full QQ report →

Messenger trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

QQ trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Messenger or QQ? v
Messenger earns about $26.42M per month, while QQ earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$26.42M more per month for Messenger). Annual revenue: Messenger ≈ $317.02M/year, QQ ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Messenger or QQ? v
Messenger leads with about 7.8B estimated downloads vs 28.6M for QQ - a 271.0× gap. Messenger reports 5,000,000,000+ installs on Google Play. QQ reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Messenger and QQ in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Communication category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Messenger and QQ offer? v
Messenger: IAP range $0.05 - $399.99 per item. QQ: no IAP detected on the public listing. Messenger runs a "Subscription (~$4.47/mo)" monetization model; QQ runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Messenger or QQ? v
Messenger edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 1.7 (gap of 3.0 stars). Rating volume: Messenger 2.5M ratings, QQ 8K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Messenger vs QQ revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $26.42M for Messenger and $0 for QQ are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Communication) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Messenger or QQ to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.