MFT WF 12 vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
MFT WF 12
mft watchface
Google Play
$45/mo
~$537/yr · 4K installs
VS
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
NXV Watch Face
Google Play
$133/mo
~$1.6K/yr · 7K installs
Revenue winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+196% vs other
Installs winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+85% vs other
MAU winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+89% vs other
Rating winner
MFT WF 12 wins
+71% vs other
Why NXV43 Elegant Watch Face is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns roughly 3× more per month than MFT WF 12 - $133 vs $45.
- Bigger install base. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face has ~7K lifetime installs vs MFT WF 12's ~4K - 1.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NXV43 Elegant Watch Face report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MFT WF 12
vs
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$45
▶
$133
Annual revenue (est.)
$537
▶
$1.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
4K
▶
7K
Monthly active users (est.)?
369.46
▶
698.4
App Store rating
4.40★
◀
2.58★
Total ratings
86
◀
54
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Apr 12, 2024
- Last updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.59
- Released
- Dec 18, 2021
- Last updated
- Sep 20, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
MFT WF 12 trajectory
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MFT WF 12 or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns about $133 per month, while MFT WF 12 earns about $45. That is a 3.0× revenue gap (~$88 more per month for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face). Annual revenue: MFT WF 12 ≈ $537/year, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face ≈ $1.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MFT WF 12 or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face leads with about 7K estimated downloads vs 4K for MFT WF 12 - a 1.9× gap. MFT WF 12 reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MFT WF 12 and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do MFT WF 12 and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face have in-app purchases? v
MFT WF 12 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: MFT WF 12 runs "Paid app ($0.99)", NXV43 Elegant Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.59)".
Which has better ratings, MFT WF 12 or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
MFT WF 12 edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 2.6 (gap of 1.8 stars). Rating volume: MFT WF 12 86 ratings, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face 21 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MFT WF 12 vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $45 for MFT WF 12 and $133 for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MFT WF 12 or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.