Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker vs RunwayML

RunwayML earns about $0 per month, while Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker ≈ $0/year, RunwayML ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker leads with about 8.5M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for RunwayML - a 6.6× gap. Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker's App Store downloads are estimated from 77K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. RunwayML's App Store downloads are estimated from 12K ratings.

Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. RunwayML does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", RunwayML runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".

Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker 77K ratings, RunwayML 12K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Momo: AI Photo & Video Maker and $0 for RunwayML are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.