MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter
MyFitnessPal, Inc.
App Store
$6.07M/mo
~$72.80M/yr · 128.2M installs
VS
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 350.5M installs
Revenue winner
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins
+606635500% vs other
Installs winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+173% vs other
MAU winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+11% vs other
Rating winner
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins
+34% vs other
Why MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter earns roughly 6066355× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracking - $6.07M vs $0.
- Subscription model. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter runs 6 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
- Better app store reviews. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter sits at 4.71★ vs 3.51★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter
vs
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$6.07M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$72.80M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
128.2M
▶
350.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
10.4M
▶
11.6M
App Store rating
4.71★
◀
3.51★
Total ratings
2.3M
◀
679K
US grossing rank
#34
◀
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2009
- Last updated
- May 12, 2026
- File size
- 471.2 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 26.19.0
- Languages
- Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Indonesian +13 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2014
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter trajectory
Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter earns about $6.07M per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$6.07M more per month for MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter ≈ $72.80M/year, Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 350.5M estimated downloads vs 128.2M for MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter - a 2.7× gap. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 2.3M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking offer? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Google Fit: Activity Tracking: no IAP detected on the public listing. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo, fitness-sub) · calibrated by US grossing rank #34" monetization model; Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter 2.3M ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking 29K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $6.07M for MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter and $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.