MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter
MyFitnessPal, Inc.
App Store
$8.14M/mo
~$97.69M/yr · 128.8M installs
VS
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
AIBY
App Store
$653.8K/mo
~$7.85M/yr · 3.6M installs
Revenue winner
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins
+1145% vs other
Installs winner
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins
+3455% vs other
MAU winner
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins
+1016% vs other
Rating winner
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins
+0% vs other
Why MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter earns roughly 12× more per month than OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner - $8.14M vs $653.8K.
- Aggressive pricing. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter undercuts at $12.00/mo vs $21.68/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter has ~128.8M lifetime installs vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner's ~3.6M - 35.6× the funnel top.
- Charts placement. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter ranks #42 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter
vs
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.14M
◀
$653.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$97.69M
◀
$7.85M
Lifetime installs (est.)
128.8M
◀
3.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
10.4M
◀
934K
App Store rating
4.71★
◀
4.69★
Total ratings
2.3M
◀
33K
US grossing rank
#42
◀
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.00
▶
$21.68
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
8 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2009
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 485.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 26.26.0
- Languages
- Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Indonesian +13 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 14, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 115.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.3
- Languages
- Arabic, English, Portuguese, Spanish
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter trajectory
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter earns about $8.14M per month, while OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner earns about $653.8K. That is a 12.5× revenue gap (~$7.49M more per month for MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter ≈ $97.69M/year, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner ≈ $7.85M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter leads with about 128.8M estimated downloads vs 3.6M for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner - a 35.6× gap. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 2.3M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 33K ratings.
Are MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter and OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter and OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner offer? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter: no IAP detected on the public listing. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner: IAP range 8 tiers detected. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub) · calibrated by US grossing rank #42" monetization model; OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner runs "Subscription (~$21.68/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter 2.3M ratings, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner 33K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.14M for MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter and $653.8K for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.