No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube vs PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube
Guillaume Claverie
App Store
$48/mo
~$574/yr · 600 installs
VS
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver
PIKCLOUD PTE. LTD.
App Store
$299/mo
~$3.6K/yr · 11K installs
Revenue winner
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver wins
+523% vs other
Installs winner
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver wins
+1683% vs other
MAU winner
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver wins
+1513% vs other
Rating winner
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube wins
+44% vs other
Why PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver earns roughly 6× more per month than No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube - $299 vs $48.
- Subscription model. PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver runs a $4.99/mo subscription that compounds; No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver has ~11K lifetime installs vs No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube's ~600 - 17.8× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver runs 5 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube
vs
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$48
▶
$299
Annual revenue (est.)
$574
▶
$3.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
600
▶
11K
Monthly active users (est.)?
69
▶
1K
App Store rating
4.33★
◀
3.01★
Total ratings
12
▶
214
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$4.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- USD2.99
- Released
- May 22, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 0.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2022
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 173.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.0.1
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese +3 more
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube trajectory
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube or PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver? v
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver earns about $299 per month, while No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube earns about $48. That is a 6.2× revenue gap (~$251 more per month for PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver). Annual revenue: No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube ≈ $574/year, PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver ≈ $3.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube or PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver? v
PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver leads with about 11K estimated downloads vs 600 for No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube - a 17.8× gap. No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube's App Store downloads are estimated from 12 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver's App Store downloads are estimated from 214 ratings.
Are No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube and PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube and PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver offer? v
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube: no IAP detected on the public listing. PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver: IAP range 5 tiers detected. No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube runs a "Paid app ($2.99)" monetization model; PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver runs "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube or PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver? v
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube edges ahead with ★ 4.3 vs ★ 3.0 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube 12 ratings, PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver 214 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube vs PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $48 for No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube and $299 for PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube or PikPak - Cloud Storage & Saver to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.