NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals vs Pam Fitness & Food

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals

The New York Times Company
App Store
$1.86M/mo
~$22.31M/yr · 80.1M installs
VS

Pam Fitness & Food

PLR UG
App Store
$4.8K/mo
~$57.6K/yr · 89K installs
Revenue winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +38600% vs other
Installs winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +89415% vs other
MAU winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +90168% vs other
Rating winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +3% vs other

Why NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns roughly 387× more per month than Pam Fitness & Food - $1.86M vs $4.8K.
  2. Premium pricing. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals charges $4.99/mo vs Pam Fitness & Food's $1.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals has ~80.1M lifetime installs vs Pam Fitness & Food's ~89K - 895.2× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs 8 IAP tiers vs 5 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals
vs
Pam Fitness & Food
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.86M
◀
$4.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$22.31M
◀
$57.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
80.1M
◀
89K
Monthly active users (est.)?
9.6M
◀
11K
App Store rating
4.91★
◀
4.78★
Total ratings
534K
◀
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
◀
$1.99
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
5 tiers

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals

The New York Times Company
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Sep 17, 2014
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
209.4 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
4.157.0
Languages
English
View full NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals report →

Pam Fitness & Food

PLR UG
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jan 23, 2021
Last updated
Jan 27, 2026
File size
53.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2.2.4
Languages
English, German
View full Pam Fitness & Food report →

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Pam Fitness & Food trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals App Store page →Pam Fitness & Food App Store page →

Related comparisons

Fussy Toddler Recipes iOS vs Nyt Cooking Quick Tasty Meals iOSNyt Cooking Quick Tasty Meals iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidLove Manuela iOS vs Nyt Cooking Quick Tasty Meals iOSNyt Cooking Quick Tasty Meals iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Nyt Cooking Quick Tasty Meals iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Nyt Cooking Quick Tasty Meals iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Pam Fitness & Food? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns about $1.86M per month, while Pam Fitness & Food earns about $4.8K. That is a 387.0× revenue gap (~$1.85M more per month for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals). Annual revenue: NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals ≈ $22.31M/year, Pam Fitness & Food ≈ $57.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Pam Fitness & Food? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals leads with about 80.1M estimated downloads vs 89K for Pam Fitness & Food - a 895.2× gap. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals's App Store downloads are estimated from 534K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Pam Fitness & Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and Pam Fitness & Food in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and Pam Fitness & Food offer? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Pam Fitness & Food: IAP range 5 tiers detected. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)" monetization model; Pam Fitness & Food runs "Subscription (~$13.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Pam Fitness & Food? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals 534K ratings, Pam Fitness & Food 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals vs Pam Fitness & Food revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.86M for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and $4.8K for Pam Fitness & Food are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Pam Fitness & Food to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.