NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals vs Starting Solids & Baby Food
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals
The New York Times Company
App Store
$929.7K/mo
~$11.16M/yr · 80.1M installs
VS
Starting Solids & Baby Food
WISERAPPS YAZILIM HIZMETLERI ANONIM SIRKETI
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 5K installs
Revenue winner
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins
+92966700% vs other
Installs winner
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins
+1759703% vs other
MAU winner
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins
+910143% vs other
Rating winner
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins
+10% vs other
Why NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns roughly 929667× more per month than Starting Solids & Baby Food - $929.7K vs $0.
- Subscription model. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs a $4.99/mo subscription that compounds; Starting Solids & Baby Food relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals has ~80.1M lifetime installs vs Starting Solids & Baby Food's ~5K - 17598.0× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$929.7K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$11.16M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
80.1M
◀
5K
Monthly active users (est.)?
4.8M
◀
527.8
App Store rating
4.91★
◀
4.46★
Total ratings
534K
◀
91
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 17, 2014
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 209.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 4.157.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 15, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- File size
- 103.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.7.1
- Languages
- Arabic, Catalan, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch +26 more
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals trajectory
Starting Solids & Baby Food trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Starting Solids & Baby Food? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns about $929.7K per month, while Starting Solids & Baby Food earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$929.7K more per month for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals). Annual revenue: NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals ≈ $11.16M/year, Starting Solids & Baby Food ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Starting Solids & Baby Food? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals leads with about 80.1M estimated downloads vs 5K for Starting Solids & Baby Food - a 17598.0× gap. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals's App Store downloads are estimated from 534K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Starting Solids & Baby Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 90 ratings.
Are NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and Starting Solids & Baby Food in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and Starting Solids & Baby Food offer? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Starting Solids & Baby Food: no IAP detected on the public listing. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)" monetization model; Starting Solids & Baby Food runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Starting Solids & Baby Food? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals 534K ratings, Starting Solids & Baby Food 90 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals vs Starting Solids & Baby Food revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $929.7K for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and $0 for Starting Solids & Baby Food are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals or Starting Solids & Baby Food to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
