Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter

Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner

Giga Studios, Inc
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 4.3M installs
VS

BitePal: AI Calorie Counter

RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$347.4K/mo
~$4.17M/yr · 4.3M installs
Revenue winner BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins +34735700% vs other
Installs winner Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins +1% vs other
MAU winner Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins +84% vs other
Rating winner Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins +6% vs other

Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 347357× more per month than Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner - $347.4K vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a $8.90/mo subscription that compounds; Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner relies on one-shot IAP or ads.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
vs
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
$347.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
$4.17M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.3M
4.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.1M
611K
App Store rating
4.81★
4.52★
Total ratings
39K
324K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$8.90
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner

Giga Studios, Inc
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jan 24, 2025
Last updated
Jun 29, 2026
File size
174.5 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
3.17.2
Languages
English
View full Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner report →

BitePal: AI Calorie Counter

RefaceLithuania
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
May 3, 2024
Last updated
Jun 26, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.20.0
Languages
-
View full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report →

Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $347.4K per month, while Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$347.4K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $0/year, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $4.17M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter? v
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner leads with about 4.3M estimated downloads vs 4.3M for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - a 1.0× gap. Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 39K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner and BitePal: AI Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner and BitePal: AI Calorie Counter offer? v
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner: no IAP detected on the public listing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter? v
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner 39K ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner and $347.4K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.