OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
AIBY
App Store
$646.3K/mo
~$7.76M/yr · 3.6M installs
VS
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Improvement Tech LLC
Google Play
$416.2K/mo
~$4.99M/yr · 4.0M installs
Revenue winner
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner wins
+55% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+11% vs other
MAU winner
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner wins
+61% vs other
Rating winner
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner wins
+1% vs other
Why OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner earns roughly 2× more per month than Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker - $646.3K vs $416.2K.
- Aggressive pricing. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner undercuts at $21.68/mo vs $24.48/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- More monetization surfaces. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
vs
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$646.3K
◀
$416.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$7.76M
◀
$4.99M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.6M
▶
4.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
924K
◀
575K
App Store rating
4.69★
◀
4.64★
Total ratings
33K
▶
264K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$21.68
▶
$24.48
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 14, 2022
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 113.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.1
- Languages
- Arabic, English, Portuguese, Spanish
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 29, 2024
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.231
- Languages
- -
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner trajectory
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner earns about $646.3K per month, while Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns about $416.2K. That is a 1.6× revenue gap (~$230.1K more per month for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner). Annual revenue: OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner ≈ $7.76M/year, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $4.99M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 4.0M estimated downloads vs 3.6M for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner - a 1.1× gap. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 33K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner and Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner and Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker offer? v
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $59.99 per item. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner runs a "Subscription (~$21.68/mo)" monetization model; Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$24.48/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner 33K ratings, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $646.3K for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner and $416.2K for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.