Pam Fitness & Food vs Starting solids - Baby Foods +
Pam Fitness & Food
PLR UG
App Store
$4.8K/mo
~$57.8K/yr · 90K installs
VS
Starting solids - Baby Foods +
Sergey Lomakin
App Store
$2/mo
~$23/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Pam Fitness & Food wins
+240750% vs other
Installs winner
Pam Fitness & Food wins
+22320% vs other
MAU winner
Pam Fitness & Food wins
+22510% vs other
Rating winner
Pam Fitness & Food wins
+2% vs other
Why Pam Fitness & Food is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Pam Fitness & Food earns roughly 2409× more per month than Starting solids - Baby Foods + - $4.8K vs $2.
- Premium pricing. Pam Fitness & Food charges $2.99/mo vs Starting solids - Baby Foods +'s $1.24/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Pam Fitness & Food has ~90K lifetime installs vs Starting solids - Baby Foods +'s ~400 - 224.2× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Pam Fitness & Food runs 5 IAP tiers vs 4 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Pam Fitness & Food report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Pam Fitness & Food
vs
Starting solids - Baby Foods +
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$4.8K
◀
$2
Annual revenue (est.)
$57.8K
◀
$23
Lifetime installs (est.)
90K
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
11K
◀
47.2
App Store rating
4.78★
◀
4.67★
Total ratings
1K
◀
6
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.99
◀
$1.24
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
4 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 23, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 12, 2026
- File size
- 77.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.4.0
- Languages
- English, German
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 4, 2026
- File size
- 92.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.8
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Hindi, Italian +7 more
Pam Fitness & Food trajectory
Starting solids - Baby Foods + trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Pam Fitness & Food or Starting solids - Baby Foods +? v
Pam Fitness & Food earns about $4.8K per month, while Starting solids - Baby Foods + earns about $2. That is a 2408.5× revenue gap (~$4.8K more per month for Pam Fitness & Food). Annual revenue: Pam Fitness & Food ≈ $57.8K/year, Starting solids - Baby Foods + ≈ $23/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Pam Fitness & Food or Starting solids - Baby Foods +? v
Pam Fitness & Food leads with about 90K estimated downloads vs 400 for Starting solids - Baby Foods + - a 224.2× gap. Pam Fitness & Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Starting solids - Baby Foods +'s App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings.
Are Pam Fitness & Food and Starting solids - Baby Foods + in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Pam Fitness & Food and Starting solids - Baby Foods + offer? v
Pam Fitness & Food: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Starting solids - Baby Foods +: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Pam Fitness & Food runs a "Subscription (~$13.99/mo)" monetization model; Starting solids - Baby Foods + runs "Subscription (~$1.24/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Pam Fitness & Food or Starting solids - Baby Foods +? v
Pam Fitness & Food edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Pam Fitness & Food 1K ratings, Starting solids - Baby Foods + 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Pam Fitness & Food vs Starting solids - Baby Foods + revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $4.8K for Pam Fitness & Food and $2 for Starting solids - Baby Foods + are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Pam Fitness & Food or Starting solids - Baby Foods + to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.