Pix Material Expressive Icons vs TREK: 25th Century Interface
Pix Material Expressive Icons
PashaPuma Design
Google Play
$764/mo
~$9.2K/yr · 32K installs
VS
TREK: 25th Century Interface
NSTEnterprises
Google Play
$269/mo
~$3.2K/yr · 5K installs
Revenue winner
Pix Material Expressive Icons wins
+184% vs other
Installs winner
Pix Material Expressive Icons wins
+540% vs other
MAU winner
Pix Material Expressive Icons wins
+529% vs other
Rating winner
TREK: 25th Century Interface wins
+4% vs other
Why Pix Material Expressive Icons is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Pix Material Expressive Icons earns roughly 3× more per month than TREK: 25th Century Interface - $764 vs $269.
- Subscription model. Pix Material Expressive Icons runs a $3.14/mo subscription that compounds; TREK: 25th Century Interface relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Pix Material Expressive Icons has ~32K lifetime installs vs TREK: 25th Century Interface's ~5K - 6.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Pix Material Expressive Icons report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Pix Material Expressive Icons
vs
TREK: 25th Century Interface
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$764
◀
$269
Annual revenue (est.)
$9.2K
◀
$3.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
32K
◀
5K
Monthly active users (est.)?
4K
◀
589.882
App Store rating
4.47★
▶
4.63★
Total ratings
1K
◀
266
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.14
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Sep 5, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 12, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 11.8.0.Build
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD4.49
- Released
- Aug 27, 2022
- Last updated
- Feb 14, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0
- Languages
- -
Pix Material Expressive Icons trajectory
TREK: 25th Century Interface trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Pix Material Expressive Icons or TREK: 25th Century Interface? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons earns about $764 per month, while TREK: 25th Century Interface earns about $269. That is a 2.8× revenue gap (~$495 more per month for Pix Material Expressive Icons). Annual revenue: Pix Material Expressive Icons ≈ $9.2K/year, TREK: 25th Century Interface ≈ $3.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Pix Material Expressive Icons or TREK: 25th Century Interface? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons leads with about 32K estimated downloads vs 5K for TREK: 25th Century Interface - a 6.4× gap. Pix Material Expressive Icons reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. TREK: 25th Century Interface reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Pix Material Expressive Icons and TREK: 25th Century Interface in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Pix Material Expressive Icons and TREK: 25th Century Interface offer? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons: IAP range $0.99 - $9.99 per item. TREK: 25th Century Interface: no IAP detected on the public listing. Pix Material Expressive Icons runs a "Paid app ($1.99)" monetization model; TREK: 25th Century Interface runs "Paid app ($4.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Pix Material Expressive Icons or TREK: 25th Century Interface? v
TREK: 25th Century Interface edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Pix Material Expressive Icons 86 ratings, TREK: 25th Century Interface 108 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Pix Material Expressive Icons vs TREK: 25th Century Interface revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $764 for Pix Material Expressive Icons and $269 for TREK: 25th Century Interface are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Pix Material Expressive Icons or TREK: 25th Century Interface to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.