RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera vs YouTube

RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera

BrainCake Inc.
App Store
$202.2K/mo
~$2.43M/yr · 1.5M installs
VS

YouTube

Google
App Store
$381.33M/mo
~$4.58B/yr · 5.0B installs
Revenue winner YouTube wins +188531% vs other
Installs winner YouTube wins +327076% vs other
MAU winner YouTube wins +861729% vs other
Rating winner YouTube wins +0% vs other

Why YouTube is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. YouTube earns roughly 1886× more per month than RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera - $381.33M vs $202.2K.
  2. Premium pricing. YouTube charges $20.99/mo vs RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera's $19.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. YouTube has ~5.0B lifetime installs vs RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera's ~1.5M - 3271.8× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. YouTube runs 4 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full YouTube report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera
vs
YouTube
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$202.2K
$381.33M
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.43M
$4.58B
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.5M
5.0B
Monthly active users (est.)?
313K
2.7B
App Store rating
4.67★
4.67★
Total ratings
14K
47.1M
US grossing rank
-
#2
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
$20.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
4 tiers

RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera

BrainCake Inc.
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Dec 4, 2008
Last updated
Feb 1, 2022
File size
124.5 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2.1.2
Languages
English
View full RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera report →

YouTube

Google
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Sep 11, 2012
Last updated
May 3, 2026
File size
341.1 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
21.18.4
Languages
AF, SQ, AM, Arabic, HY, AZ +66 more
View full YouTube report →

RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

YouTube trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera or YouTube? v
YouTube earns about $381.33M per month, while RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera earns about $202.2K. That is a 1886.3× revenue gap (~$381.13M more per month for YouTube). Annual revenue: RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera ≈ $2.43M/year, YouTube ≈ $4.58B/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera or YouTube? v
YouTube leads with about 5.0B estimated downloads vs 1.5M for RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera - a 3271.8× gap. RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. YouTube's App Store downloads are estimated from 47.1M ratings.
Are RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera and YouTube in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera and YouTube offer? v
RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera: IAP range 1 tiers detected. YouTube: IAP range 4 tiers detected. RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)" monetization model; YouTube runs "Subscription (~$20.99/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #2". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera or YouTube? v
YouTube edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera 14K ratings, YouTube 47.1M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera vs YouTube revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $202.2K for RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera and $381.33M for YouTube are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera or YouTube to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.