InterFasting - Fasting Timer vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
InterFasting - Fasting Timer
Liviet
Google Play
$31.8K/mo
~$381.4K/yr · 290K installs
VS
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Yazio
Google Play
$4.75M/mo
~$56.97M/yr · 56.4M installs
Revenue winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+14840% vs other
Installs winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+19364% vs other
MAU winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+8472% vs other
Rating winner
InterFasting - Fasting Timer wins
+5% vs other
Why Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 149× more per month than InterFasting - Fasting Timer - $4.75M vs $31.8K.
- Premium pricing. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker charges $45.79/mo vs InterFasting - Fasting Timer's $6.92/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker has ~56.4M lifetime installs vs InterFasting - Fasting Timer's ~290K - 194.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
InterFasting - Fasting Timer
vs
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$31.8K
▶
$4.75M
Annual revenue (est.)
$381.4K
▶
$56.97M
Lifetime installs (est.)
290K
▶
56.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
56K
▶
4.8M
App Store rating
4.64★
◀
4.41★
Total ratings
6K
▶
827K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.92
▶
$45.79
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 12, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Mature 17+
- Version
- 3.309
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 23, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 26.25.0
- Languages
- -
InterFasting - Fasting Timer trajectory
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, InterFasting - Fasting Timer or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $4.75M per month, while InterFasting - Fasting Timer earns about $31.8K. That is a 149.4× revenue gap (~$4.72M more per month for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: InterFasting - Fasting Timer ≈ $381.4K/year, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $56.97M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, InterFasting - Fasting Timer or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker leads with about 56.4M estimated downloads vs 290K for InterFasting - Fasting Timer - a 194.6× gap. InterFasting - Fasting Timer reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are InterFasting - Fasting Timer and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do InterFasting - Fasting Timer and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
InterFasting - Fasting Timer: IAP range $3.99 - $11.99 per item. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $299.99 per item. InterFasting - Fasting Timer runs a "Subscription (~$6.92/mo)" monetization model; Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$45.79/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, InterFasting - Fasting Timer or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
InterFasting - Fasting Timer edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: InterFasting - Fasting Timer 6 ratings, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these InterFasting - Fasting Timer vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $31.8K for InterFasting - Fasting Timer and $4.75M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare InterFasting - Fasting Timer or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.