Huckleberry: Baby & Child vs Squeezy
Huckleberry: Baby & Child
Huckleberry Labs Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 7.5M installs
VS
Squeezy
Living With Ltd
App Store
$1.6K/mo
~$19.7K/yr · 12K installs
Revenue winner
Squeezy wins
+164300% vs other
Installs winner
Huckleberry: Baby & Child wins
+60506% vs other
MAU winner
Huckleberry: Baby & Child wins
+61208% vs other
Rating winner
Huckleberry: Baby & Child wins
+3% vs other
Why Squeezy is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Squeezy earns roughly 1643× more per month than Huckleberry: Baby & Child - $1.6K vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Squeezy report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Huckleberry: Baby & Child
vs
Squeezy
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$1.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$19.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
7.5M
◀
12K
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.0M
◀
3K
App Store rating
4.92★
◀
4.79★
Total ratings
68K
◀
247
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Medical
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 4, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 11, 2026
- File size
- 202.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- v0.9.298
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Medical
- Price
- USD4.99
- Released
- Oct 14, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 41.6 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 10.1.4
- Languages
- English, Polish
Huckleberry: Baby & Child trajectory
Squeezy trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Huckleberry: Baby & Child or Squeezy? v
Squeezy earns about $1.6K per month, while Huckleberry: Baby & Child earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$1.6K more per month for Squeezy). Annual revenue: Huckleberry: Baby & Child ≈ $0/year, Squeezy ≈ $19.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Huckleberry: Baby & Child or Squeezy? v
Huckleberry: Baby & Child leads with about 7.5M estimated downloads vs 12K for Squeezy - a 606.1× gap. Huckleberry: Baby & Child's App Store downloads are estimated from 68K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Squeezy's App Store downloads are estimated from 247 ratings.
Are Huckleberry: Baby & Child and Squeezy in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Medical category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Huckleberry: Baby & Child and Squeezy have in-app purchases? v
Huckleberry: Baby & Child does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Squeezy does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Huckleberry: Baby & Child runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Squeezy runs "Paid app ($4.99)".
Which has better ratings, Huckleberry: Baby & Child or Squeezy? v
Huckleberry: Baby & Child edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Huckleberry: Baby & Child 68K ratings, Squeezy 247 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Huckleberry: Baby & Child vs Squeezy revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Huckleberry: Baby & Child and $1.6K for Squeezy are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Medical) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Huckleberry: Baby & Child or Squeezy to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.