Strava: Run, Bike, Walk vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Strava Inc.
Google Play
$3.74M/mo
~$44.90M/yr · 121.8M installs
VS
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Joyride GmbH
Google Play
$39.1K/mo
~$469.3K/yr · 320K installs
Revenue winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+9468% vs other
Installs winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+37979% vs other
MAU winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+6984% vs other
Rating winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+1% vs other
Why Strava: Run, Bike, Walk is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Strava: Run, Bike, Walk earns roughly 96× more per month than WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker - $3.74M vs $39.1K.
- Premium pricing. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk charges $27.34/mo vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker's $11.60/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has ~121.8M lifetime installs vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker's ~320K - 380.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Strava: Run, Bike, Walk report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
vs
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.74M
◀
$39.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$44.90M
◀
$469.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
121.8M
◀
320K
Monthly active users (est.)?
4.9M
◀
69K
App Store rating
4.59★
◀
4.56★
Total ratings
1.1M
◀
3K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$27.34
◀
$11.60
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 9, 2011
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 7, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 202604.1.2
- Languages
- -
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk trajectory
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk earns about $3.74M per month, while WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker earns about $39.1K. That is a 95.7× revenue gap (~$3.70M more per month for Strava: Run, Bike, Walk). Annual revenue: Strava: Run, Bike, Walk ≈ $44.90M/year, WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker ≈ $469.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk leads with about 121.8M estimated downloads vs 320K for WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker - a 380.8× gap. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Strava: Run, Bike, Walk and WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Strava: Run, Bike, Walk and WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker offer? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk: IAP range $2.99 - $249.99 per item. WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker: IAP range $2.99 - $44.99 per item. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk runs a "Subscription (~$27.34/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.60/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Strava: Run, Bike, Walk 34K ratings, WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker 43 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Strava: Run, Bike, Walk vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.74M for Strava: Run, Bike, Walk and $39.1K for WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Strava: Run, Bike, Walk or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.