Threads vs WeScoop
Threads
Instagram, Inc.
App Store
$10.44M/mo
~$125.28M/yr · 349.6M installs
VS
WeScoop
Scoopchat Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Threads wins
+1043969000% vs other
Installs winner
Threads wins
+87410925% vs other
MAU winner
Threads wins
+23419458% vs other
Rating winner
Threads wins
+32% vs other
Why Threads is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Threads earns roughly 10439690× more per month than WeScoop - $10.44M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Threads runs a $12.99/mo subscription that compounds; WeScoop relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Threads has ~349.6M lifetime installs vs WeScoop's ~400 - 874110.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Threads runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Threads report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Threads
vs
WeScoop
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$10.44M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$125.28M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
349.6M
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
24.8M
◀
106
App Store rating
4.64★
◀
3.50★
Total ratings
2.1M
◀
6
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 5, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 199.6 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 436.0
- Languages
- Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +25 more
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 29, 2022
- Last updated
- Dec 20, 2023
- File size
- 223.1 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 1.0.90
- Languages
- English, French
Threads trajectory
WeScoop trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Threads or WeScoop? v
Threads earns about $10.44M per month, while WeScoop earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$10.44M more per month for Threads). Annual revenue: Threads ≈ $125.28M/year, WeScoop ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Threads or WeScoop? v
Threads leads with about 349.6M estimated downloads vs 400 for WeScoop - a 874110.3× gap. Threads's App Store downloads are estimated from 2.1M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. WeScoop's App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings.
Are Threads and WeScoop in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Social Networking category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Threads and WeScoop offer? v
Threads: IAP range 4 tiers detected. WeScoop: no IAP detected on the public listing. Threads runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; WeScoop runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Threads or WeScoop? v
Threads edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.1 stars). Rating volume: Threads 2.1M ratings, WeScoop 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Threads vs WeScoop revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $10.44M for Threads and $0 for WeScoop are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Threads or WeScoop to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.