Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
$2.88M/mo
~$34.56M/yr · 75.6M installs
VS

Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode

Easy MT
Google Play
$2.5K/mo
~$29.9K/yr · 147K installs
Revenue winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +115321% vs other
Installs winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +51465% vs other
MAU winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +30479% vs other
Rating winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +14% vs other

Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 1154× more per month than Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode - $2.88M vs $2.5K.
  2. Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste charges $10.00/mo vs Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode's $4.45/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.6M lifetime installs vs Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode's ~147K - 515.6× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 4.33★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
vs
Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.88M
◀
$2.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$34.56M
◀
$29.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
75.6M
◀
147K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.9M
◀
13K
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
4.33★
Total ratings
504K
◀
479
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
◀
$4.45
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 8, 2015
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
141.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
26.5.0
Languages
EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
View full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report →

Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode

Easy MT
Google Play
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Oct 15, 2025
Last updated
Feb 9, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.0.34
Languages
-
View full Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode report →

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste App Store page →Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Fussy Toddler Recipes iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSAllergy Food Scanner Ryla iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSToo Good to Go End Food Waste iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidLove Manuela iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $2.88M per month, while Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode earns about $2.5K. That is a 1154.2× revenue gap (~$2.88M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $34.56M/year, Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode ≈ $29.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.6M estimated downloads vs 147K for Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode - a 515.6× gap. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 504K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode offer? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode: IAP range $0.99 - $19.99 per item. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)" monetization model; Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode runs "Subscription (~$4.45/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 504K ratings, Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.88M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and $2.5K for Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Halal Scanner: Barcode & ECode to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.