Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$5.73M/mo
~$68.75M/yr · 75.2M installs
VS
magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining
magicpin: cashback / home delivery on local retail
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 24.3M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+572949900% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+209% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+818% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+24% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 5729499× more per month than magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining - $5.73M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a $10.00/mo subscription that compounds; magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.2M lifetime installs vs magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining's ~24.3M - 3.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 3.96★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
vs
magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.73M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$68.75M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
75.2M
◀
24.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.6M
◀
828K
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
3.96★
Total ratings
502K
◀
252K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 4, 2015
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.115.0.0
- Languages
- -
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $5.73M per month, while magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$5.73M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $68.75M/year, magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.2M estimated downloads vs 24.3M for magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining - a 3.1× gap. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 502K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining have in-app purchases? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)", magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 502K ratings, magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining 35 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.73M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and $0 for magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or magicpin:Food Delivery, Dining to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.