Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$2.88M/mo
~$34.56M/yr · 75.6M installs
VS
Samsung Food: Meal Planner
SamsungFood
Google Play
$63.1K/mo
~$757.7K/yr · 3.7M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+4461% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+1967% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+1718% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+9% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 46× more per month than Samsung Food: Meal Planner - $2.88M vs $63.1K.
- Aggressive pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste undercuts at $10.00/mo vs $20.48/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.6M lifetime installs vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner's ~3.7M - 20.7× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 4.52★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.88M
◀
$63.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$34.56M
◀
$757.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
75.6M
◀
3.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.9M
◀
212K
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
4.52★
Total ratings
504K
◀
22K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
▶
$20.48
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 16, 2019
- Last updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 2.54.0
- Languages
- -
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
Samsung Food: Meal Planner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $2.88M per month, while Samsung Food: Meal Planner earns about $63.1K. That is a 45.6× revenue gap (~$2.82M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $34.56M/year, Samsung Food: Meal Planner ≈ $757.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.6M estimated downloads vs 3.7M for Samsung Food: Meal Planner - a 20.7× gap. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 504K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Samsung Food: Meal Planner reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and Samsung Food: Meal Planner in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and Samsung Food: Meal Planner offer? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. Samsung Food: Meal Planner: IAP range $6.99 - $59.99 per item. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)" monetization model; Samsung Food: Meal Planner runs "Subscription (~$20.48/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 504K ratings, Samsung Food: Meal Planner 4K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.88M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and $63.1K for Samsung Food: Meal Planner are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Samsung Food: Meal Planner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
