Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$2.88M/mo
~$34.56M/yr · 75.6M installs
VS
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Treat App
App Store
$967.6K/mo
~$11.61M/yr · 5.2M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+198% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+1344% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+514% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+1% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 3× more per month than TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs - $2.88M vs $967.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste undercuts at $10.00/mo vs $47.75/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.6M lifetime installs vs TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs's ~5.2M - 14.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
vs
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.88M
◀
$967.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$34.56M
◀
$11.61M
Lifetime installs (est.)
75.6M
◀
5.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.9M
◀
628K
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
4.89★
Total ratings
504K
◀
48K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
▶
$47.75
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 15, 2022
- Last updated
- Apr 12, 2026
- File size
- 267.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 20.6.1
- Languages
- English, Russian
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $2.88M per month, while TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs earns about $967.6K. That is a 3.0× revenue gap (~$1.91M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $34.56M/year, TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs ≈ $11.61M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.6M estimated downloads vs 5.2M for TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs - a 14.4× gap. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 504K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs's App Store downloads are estimated from 48K ratings.
Are Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs offer? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)" monetization model; TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs runs "Subscription (~$47.75/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 504K ratings, TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs 48K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.88M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and $967.6K for TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.