Ameba vs Facebook
Ameba
CyberAgent Inc.
Google Play
$349.3K/mo
~$4.19M/yr · 10.4M installs
VS
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Google Play
$45.12M/mo
~$541.50M/yr · 11.8B installs
Revenue winner
Facebook wins
+12819% vs other
Installs winner
Facebook wins
+113329% vs other
MAU winner
Facebook wins
+23641% vs other
Rating winner
Facebook wins
+8% vs other
Why Facebook is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Facebook earns roughly 129× more per month than Ameba - $45.12M vs $349.3K.
- Bigger install base. Facebook has ~11.8B lifetime installs vs Ameba's ~10.4M - 1134.3× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Facebook sits at 4.56★ vs 4.21★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Facebook report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Ameba
vs
Facebook
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$349.3K
▶
$45.12M
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.19M
▶
$541.50M
Lifetime installs (est.)
10.4M
▶
11.8B
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.3M
▶
319.1M
App Store rating
4.21★
▶
4.56★
Total ratings
86K
▶
183.0M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$15.73
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Social
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 13, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 22, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 26.26.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Social
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Ameba trajectory
Facebook trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Ameba or Facebook? v
Facebook earns about $45.12M per month, while Ameba earns about $349.3K. That is a 129.2× revenue gap (~$44.78M more per month for Facebook). Annual revenue: Ameba ≈ $4.19M/year, Facebook ≈ $541.50M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Ameba or Facebook? v
Facebook leads with about 11.8B estimated downloads vs 10.4M for Ameba - a 1134.3× gap. Ameba reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Facebook reports 10,000,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Ameba and Facebook in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Social category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Ameba and Facebook offer? v
Ameba: IAP range $0.99 - $249.99 per item. Facebook: IAP range $0.05 - $10,000.00 per item. Ameba runs a "Subscription (~$15.73/mo)" monetization model; Facebook runs "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Ameba or Facebook? v
Facebook edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Ameba 229 ratings, Facebook 4.2M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Ameba vs Facebook revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $349.3K for Ameba and $45.12M for Facebook are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Ameba or Facebook to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.