Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.60M/mo
~$19.15M/yr · 16.0M installs
VS
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter
Lyrebird Studio
App Store
$319.6K/mo
~$3.84M/yr · 5.4M installs
Revenue winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+399% vs other
Installs winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+196% vs other
MAU winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+125% vs other
Rating winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+3% vs other
Why Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns roughly 5× more per month than FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter - $1.60M vs $319.6K.
- Premium pricing. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera charges $12.99/mo vs FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter's $5.83/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera has ~16.0M lifetime installs vs FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter's ~5.4M - 3.0× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs 10 IAP tiers vs 7 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
vs
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.60M
◀
$319.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$19.15M
◀
$3.84M
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.0M
◀
5.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.8M
◀
1.7M
App Store rating
4.75★
◀
4.60★
Total ratings
107K
◀
49K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
◀
$5.83
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
7 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2018
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 138.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.17.1
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 13, 2020
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 130.5 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 5.1.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Hebrew, Hindi +10 more
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $1.60M per month, while FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter earns about $319.6K. That is a 5.0× revenue gap (~$1.28M more per month for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera). Annual revenue: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $19.15M/year, FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter ≈ $3.84M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera leads with about 16.0M estimated downloads vs 5.4M for FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter - a 3.0× gap. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 107K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings.
Are Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter offer? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: IAP range 10 tiers detected. FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 107K ratings, FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter 49K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.60M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and $319.6K for FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.