Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs MRRMRR-Face filters and masks
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.64M/mo
~$19.74M/yr · 16.5M installs
VS
MRRMRR-Face filters and masks
Ludmila Shcherbachuk
App Store
$256.5K/mo
~$3.08M/yr · 4.3M installs
Revenue winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+541% vs other
Installs winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+286% vs other
MAU winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+196% vs other
Rating winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+7% vs other
Why Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns roughly 6× more per month than MRRMRR-Face filters and masks - $1.64M vs $256.5K.
- Premium pricing. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera charges $12.99/mo vs MRRMRR-Face filters and masks's $5.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera has ~16.5M lifetime installs vs MRRMRR-Face filters and masks's ~4.3M - 3.9× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs 10 IAP tiers vs 4 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
vs
MRRMRR-Face filters and masks
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.64M
◀
$256.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$19.74M
◀
$3.08M
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.5M
◀
4.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.9M
◀
1.3M
App Store rating
4.75★
◀
4.46★
Total ratings
110K
◀
39K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
◀
$5.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
4 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 8, 2026
- File size
- 138.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.17.3
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 10, 2016
- Last updated
- Dec 16, 2025
- File size
- 67.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.5.6
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +5 more
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory
MRRMRR-Face filters and masks trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or MRRMRR-Face filters and masks? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $1.64M per month, while MRRMRR-Face filters and masks earns about $256.5K. That is a 6.4× revenue gap (~$1.39M more per month for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera). Annual revenue: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $19.74M/year, MRRMRR-Face filters and masks ≈ $3.08M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or MRRMRR-Face filters and masks? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera leads with about 16.5M estimated downloads vs 4.3M for MRRMRR-Face filters and masks - a 3.9× gap. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 110K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MRRMRR-Face filters and masks's App Store downloads are estimated from 39K ratings.
Are Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and MRRMRR-Face filters and masks in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and MRRMRR-Face filters and masks offer? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: IAP range 10 tiers detected. MRRMRR-Face filters and masks: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; MRRMRR-Face filters and masks runs "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or MRRMRR-Face filters and masks? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 110K ratings, MRRMRR-Face filters and masks 39K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs MRRMRR-Face filters and masks revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.64M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and $256.5K for MRRMRR-Face filters and masks are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or MRRMRR-Face filters and masks to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.