Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs Shots: AI Photo Video Creator
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 16.5M installs
VS
Shots: AI Photo Video Creator
DeePix AI
App Store
$140.7K/mo
~$1.69M/yr · 642K installs
Revenue winner
Shots: AI Photo Video Creator wins
+14067600% vs other
Installs winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+2466% vs other
MAU winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+1851% vs other
Rating winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+4% vs other
Why Shots: AI Photo Video Creator is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Shots: AI Photo Video Creator earns roughly 140676× more per month than Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera - $140.7K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Shots: AI Photo Video Creator runs a $21.68/mo subscription that compounds; Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. Shots: AI Photo Video Creator runs 10 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Shots: AI Photo Video Creator report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$140.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.69M
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.5M
◀
642K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.9M
◀
201K
App Store rating
4.75★
◀
4.57★
Total ratings
110K
◀
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$21.68
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 8, 2026
- File size
- 138.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.17.3
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 4, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 20, 2026
- File size
- 103.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.6.8
- Languages
- English, French, German, Portuguese, Turkish
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory
Shots: AI Photo Video Creator trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or Shots: AI Photo Video Creator? v
Shots: AI Photo Video Creator earns about $140.7K per month, while Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$140.7K more per month for Shots: AI Photo Video Creator). Annual revenue: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $0/year, Shots: AI Photo Video Creator ≈ $1.69M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or Shots: AI Photo Video Creator? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera leads with about 16.5M estimated downloads vs 642K for Shots: AI Photo Video Creator - a 25.7× gap. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 110K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Shots: AI Photo Video Creator's App Store downloads are estimated from 8K ratings.
Are Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and Shots: AI Photo Video Creator in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and Shots: AI Photo Video Creator offer? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: no IAP detected on the public listing. Shots: AI Photo Video Creator: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Shots: AI Photo Video Creator runs "Subscription (~$21.68/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or Shots: AI Photo Video Creator? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 110K ratings, Shots: AI Photo Video Creator 8K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs Shots: AI Photo Video Creator revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and $140.7K for Shots: AI Photo Video Creator are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or Shots: AI Photo Video Creator to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
