Facebook vs GLAM - Dating & Romance
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Google Play
$44.59M/mo
~$535.12M/yr · 11.7B installs
VS
GLAM - Dating & Romance
Cupist Inc.
Google Play
$204.0K/mo
~$2.45M/yr · 4.3M installs
Revenue winner
Facebook wins
+21758% vs other
Installs winner
Facebook wins
+272861% vs other
MAU winner
Facebook wins
+37122% vs other
Rating winner
Facebook wins
+46% vs other
Why Facebook is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Facebook earns roughly 219× more per month than GLAM - Dating & Romance - $44.59M vs $204.0K.
- Bigger install base. Facebook has ~11.7B lifetime installs vs GLAM - Dating & Romance's ~4.3M - 2729.6× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Facebook sits at 4.56★ vs 3.13★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Facebook report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$44.59M
◀
$204.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$535.12M
◀
$2.45M
Lifetime installs (est.)
11.7B
◀
4.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
315.2M
◀
847K
App Store rating
4.56★
◀
3.13★
Total ratings
181.0M
◀
64K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$13.53
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Social
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Social
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 10, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 13, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Mature 17+
- Version
- 6.1.0
- Languages
- -
Facebook trajectory
GLAM - Dating & Romance trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Facebook or GLAM - Dating & Romance? v
Facebook earns about $44.59M per month, while GLAM - Dating & Romance earns about $204.0K. That is a 218.6× revenue gap (~$44.39M more per month for Facebook). Annual revenue: Facebook ≈ $535.12M/year, GLAM - Dating & Romance ≈ $2.45M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Facebook or GLAM - Dating & Romance? v
Facebook leads with about 11.7B estimated downloads vs 4.3M for GLAM - Dating & Romance - a 2729.6× gap. Facebook reports 10,000,000,000+ installs on Google Play. GLAM - Dating & Romance reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Facebook and GLAM - Dating & Romance in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Social category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Facebook and GLAM - Dating & Romance offer? v
Facebook: IAP range $0.05 - $10,000.00 per item. GLAM - Dating & Romance: IAP range $0.99 - $184.99 per item. Facebook runs a "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)" monetization model; GLAM - Dating & Romance runs "Subscription (~$13.53/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Facebook or GLAM - Dating & Romance? v
Facebook edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.1 (gap of 1.4 stars). Rating volume: Facebook 4.3M ratings, GLAM - Dating & Romance 450 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Facebook vs GLAM - Dating & Romance revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $44.59M for Facebook and $204.0K for GLAM - Dating & Romance are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Facebook or GLAM - Dating & Romance to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
