Fitbit vs Maumgyeol Mini
Fitbit
Google LLC
Google Play
$4.66M/mo
~$55.96M/yr · 253.3M installs
VS
Maumgyeol Mini
BWAVE.
Google Play
$1.8K/mo
~$22.1K/yr · 13K installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit wins
+252771% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit wins
+1914321% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit wins
+187435% vs other
Rating winner
Fitbit wins
+415% vs other
Why Fitbit is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit earns roughly 2529× more per month than Maumgyeol Mini - $4.66M vs $1.8K.
- Premium pricing. Fitbit charges $28.27/mo vs Maumgyeol Mini's $8.92/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit has ~253.3M lifetime installs vs Maumgyeol Mini's ~13K - 19144.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitbit sits at 4.15★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit
vs
Maumgyeol Mini
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$4.66M
◀
$1.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$55.96M
◀
$22.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
253.3M
◀
13K
Monthly active users (est.)?
6.1M
◀
3K
App Store rating
4.15★
◀
-
Total ratings
1.3M
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$28.27
◀
$8.92
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 11, 2024
- Last updated
- Feb 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.3
- Languages
- -
Fitbit trajectory
Maumgyeol Mini trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit or Maumgyeol Mini? v
Fitbit earns about $4.66M per month, while Maumgyeol Mini earns about $1.8K. That is a 2528.7× revenue gap (~$4.66M more per month for Fitbit). Annual revenue: Fitbit ≈ $55.96M/year, Maumgyeol Mini ≈ $22.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit or Maumgyeol Mini? v
Fitbit leads with about 253.3M estimated downloads vs 13K for Maumgyeol Mini - a 19144.2× gap. Fitbit reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Maumgyeol Mini reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit and Maumgyeol Mini in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit and Maumgyeol Mini offer? v
Fitbit: IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Maumgyeol Mini: IAP range $1.49 - $53.46 per item. Fitbit runs a "Subscription (~$28.27/mo, wellness)" monetization model; Maumgyeol Mini runs "Subscription (~$8.92/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit or Maumgyeol Mini? v
Fitbit edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.1 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit 245K ratings, Maumgyeol Mini 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit vs Maumgyeol Mini revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $4.66M for Fitbit and $1.8K for Maumgyeol Mini are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit or Maumgyeol Mini to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.