Google Health (Fitbit) vs SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google LLC
Google Play
$5.75M/mo
~$68.97M/yr · 268.8M installs
VS
SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ
Anapana Inc.
Google Play
$36/mo
~$428/yr · 256 installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+15964503% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+104987908% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+14569664% vs other
Rating winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+376% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 159646× more per month than SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ - $5.75M vs $36.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $28.27/mo vs SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ's $12.47/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~268.8M lifetime installs vs SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ's ~256 - 1049880.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Google Health (Fitbit) sits at 3.76★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.75M
◀
$36
Annual revenue (est.)
$68.97M
◀
$428
Lifetime installs (est.)
268.8M
◀
256
Monthly active users (est.)?
9.1M
◀
62.72
App Store rating
3.76★
◀
-
Total ratings
1.3M
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$28.27
◀
$12.47
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Jun 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.7
- Languages
- -
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.75M per month, while SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ earns about $36. That is a 159646.0× revenue gap (~$5.75M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.97M/year, SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ ≈ $428/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 268.8M estimated downloads vs 256 for SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ - a 1049880.1× gap. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ reports 100+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ: IAP range $3.99 - $38.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)" monetization model; SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ runs "Subscription (~$12.47/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ? v
Google Health (Fitbit) edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.8 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 251K ratings, SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.75M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $36 for SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or SPARCL CARE 長引く不調の方向けセルフケアアプリ to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
