Google Health (Fitbit) vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google LLC
Google Play
$5.75M/mo
~$68.94M/yr · 268.8M installs
VS
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Joyride GmbH
Google Play
$45.9K/mo
~$550.5K/yr · 372K installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+12423% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+72121% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+11216% vs other
Rating winner
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker wins
+24% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 125× more per month than WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker - $5.75M vs $45.9K.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $28.27/mo vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker's $11.60/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~268.8M lifetime installs vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker's ~372K - 722.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.75M
◀
$45.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$68.94M
◀
$550.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
268.8M
◀
372K
Monthly active users (est.)?
9.1M
◀
81K
App Store rating
3.76★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
1.3M
◀
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$28.27
◀
$11.60
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 7, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 202606.1.5
- Languages
- -
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.75M per month, while WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker earns about $45.9K. That is a 125.2× revenue gap (~$5.70M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.94M/year, WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker ≈ $550.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 268.8M estimated downloads vs 372K for WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker - a 722.2× gap. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker: IAP range $2.99 - $44.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)" monetization model; WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.60/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 251K ratings, WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker 54 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.75M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $45.9K for WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.