Google Health (Fitbit) vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google LLC
Google Play
$5.72M/mo
~$68.60M/yr · 266.7M installs
VS

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Yazio
Google Play
$4.74M/mo
~$56.90M/yr · 56.4M installs
Revenue winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +21% vs other
Installs winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +373% vs other
MAU winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +89% vs other
Rating winner Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins +16% vs other

Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $28.27/mo vs $45.79/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  2. Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~266.7M lifetime installs vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker's ~56.4M - 4.7× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.72M
$4.74M
Annual revenue (est.)
$68.60M
$56.90M
Lifetime installs (est.)
266.7M
56.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
9.1M
4.8M
App Store rating
3.80★
4.40★
Total ratings
1.3M
826K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$28.27
$45.79
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google LLC
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Mar 16, 2012
Last updated
Jun 18, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Google Health (Fitbit) report →

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Yazio
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 23, 2014
Last updated
Jun 19, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
26.25.0
Languages
-
View full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report →

Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

FAQ

Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.72M per month, while Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $4.74M. That is a 1.2× revenue gap (~$974.7K more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.60M/year, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $56.90M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 266.7M estimated downloads vs 56.4M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker - a 4.7× gap. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $299.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)" monetization model; Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$45.79/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 250K ratings, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.72M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $4.74M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.