Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Zwift, Inc
App Store
$390.2K/mo
~$4.68M/yr · 2.3M installs
VS
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Improvement Tech LLC
Google Play
$415.8K/mo
~$4.99M/yr · 4.0M installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+7% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+71% vs other
MAU winner
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness wins
+5% vs other
Rating winner
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness wins
+2% vs other
Why Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker charges $24.48/mo vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness's $19.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker has ~4.0M lifetime installs vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness's ~2.3M - 1.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
vs
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$390.2K
▶
$415.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.68M
▶
$4.99M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.3M
▶
4.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
603K
◀
574K
App Store rating
4.74★
◀
4.64★
Total ratings
21K
▶
264K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
▶
$24.48
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 10, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 3.52 GB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.112.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 29, 2024
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.231
- Languages
- -
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness trajectory
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns about $415.8K per month, while Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness earns about $390.2K. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$25.6K more per month for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness ≈ $4.68M/year, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $4.99M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 4.0M estimated downloads vs 2.3M for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness - a 1.7× gap. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 21K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness and Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness and Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker offer? v
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $59.99 per item. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)" monetization model; Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$24.48/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness 21K ratings, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $390.2K for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness and $415.8K for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.