Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs Facetune: Photo & Video Editor
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
Spark Dynamic
App Store
$180.0K/mo
~$2.16M/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
Facetune: Photo & Video Editor
Lightricks Ltd.
App Store
$2.30M/mo
~$27.65M/yr · 55.7M installs
Revenue winner
Facetune: Photo & Video Editor wins
+1180% vs other
Installs winner
Facetune: Photo & Video Editor wins
+2974% vs other
MAU winner
Facetune: Photo & Video Editor wins
+1467% vs other
Rating winner
Facetune: Photo & Video Editor wins
+6% vs other
Why Facetune: Photo & Video Editor is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Facetune: Photo & Video Editor earns roughly 13× more per month than Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - $2.30M vs $180.0K.
- Aggressive pricing. Facetune: Photo & Video Editor undercuts at $5.99/mo vs $9.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Facetune: Photo & Video Editor has ~55.7M lifetime installs vs Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's ~1.8M - 30.7× the funnel top.
- Charts placement. Facetune: Photo & Video Editor ranks #55 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Facetune: Photo & Video Editor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$180.0K
▶
$2.30M
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.16M
▶
$27.65M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
▶
55.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
558K
▶
8.7M
App Store rating
4.35★
▶
4.62★
Total ratings
16K
▶
371K
US grossing rank
-
▶
#55
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$5.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
=
3 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 7, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 98.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 3.0.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 24, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 553.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 26.18
- Languages
- Arabic, Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech, Danish +26 more
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters trajectory
Facetune: Photo & Video Editor trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Facetune: Photo & Video Editor? v
Facetune: Photo & Video Editor earns about $2.30M per month, while Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns about $180.0K. That is a 12.8× revenue gap (~$2.12M more per month for Facetune: Photo & Video Editor). Annual revenue: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters ≈ $2.16M/year, Facetune: Photo & Video Editor ≈ $27.65M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Facetune: Photo & Video Editor? v
Facetune: Photo & Video Editor leads with about 55.7M estimated downloads vs 1.8M for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - a 30.7× gap. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Facetune: Photo & Video Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 371K ratings.
Are Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and Facetune: Photo & Video Editor in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and Facetune: Photo & Video Editor offer? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Facetune: Photo & Video Editor: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; Facetune: Photo & Video Editor runs "Subscription (~$5.99/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #55". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Facetune: Photo & Video Editor? v
Facetune: Photo & Video Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters 16K ratings, Facetune: Photo & Video Editor 371K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs Facetune: Photo & Video Editor revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $180.0K for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and $2.30M for Facetune: Photo & Video Editor are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Facetune: Photo & Video Editor to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
