Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs Flickr
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
Spark Dynamic
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
Flickr
Flickr, Inc.
App Store
$110.6K/mo
~$1.33M/yr · 1.6M installs
Revenue winner
Flickr wins
+11056200% vs other
Installs winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+13% vs other
MAU winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+11% vs other
Rating winner
Flickr wins
+4% vs other
Why Flickr is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Flickr earns roughly 110562× more per month than Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - $110.6K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Flickr runs a $11.00/mo subscription that compounds; Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$110.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.33M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
◀
1.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
558K
◀
501K
App Store rating
4.35★
▶
4.53★
Total ratings
16K
◀
15K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$11.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 7, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 98.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 3.0.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 8, 2009
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 80.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 5.0.0
- Languages
- English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Korean +4 more
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters trajectory
Flickr trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Flickr? v
Flickr earns about $110.6K per month, while Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$110.6K more per month for Flickr). Annual revenue: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters ≈ $0/year, Flickr ≈ $1.33M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Flickr? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters leads with about 1.8M estimated downloads vs 1.6M for Flickr - a 1.1× gap. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Flickr's App Store downloads are estimated from 15K ratings.
Are Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and Flickr in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and Flickr offer? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters: no IAP detected on the public listing. Flickr: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Flickr runs "Subscription (~$6.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Flickr? v
Flickr edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters 16K ratings, Flickr 15K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs Flickr revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and $110.6K for Flickr are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Flickr to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
