Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs ism: Retro Camera & Vintage
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
Spark Dynamic
App Store
$180.0K/mo
~$2.16M/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
ism: Retro Camera & Vintage
MWM
App Store
$6.6K/mo
~$78.7K/yr · 771K installs
Revenue winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+2643% vs other
Installs winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+135% vs other
MAU winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+129% vs other
Rating winner
ism: Retro Camera & Vintage wins
+9% vs other
Why Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns roughly 27× more per month than ism: Retro Camera & Vintage - $180.0K vs $6.6K.
- Premium pricing. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters charges $9.99/mo vs ism: Retro Camera & Vintage's $0.83/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters has ~1.8M lifetime installs vs ism: Retro Camera & Vintage's ~771K - 2.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
vs
ism: Retro Camera & Vintage
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$180.0K
◀
$6.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.16M
◀
$78.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
◀
771K
Monthly active users (est.)?
558K
◀
244K
App Store rating
4.35★
▶
4.73★
Total ratings
16K
◀
10K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$0.83
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
▶
9 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 7, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 98.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 3.0.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 4, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 205.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.43.2
- Languages
- English
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters trajectory
ism: Retro Camera & Vintage trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or ism: Retro Camera & Vintage? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns about $180.0K per month, while ism: Retro Camera & Vintage earns about $6.6K. That is a 27.4× revenue gap (~$173.4K more per month for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters). Annual revenue: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters ≈ $2.16M/year, ism: Retro Camera & Vintage ≈ $78.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or ism: Retro Camera & Vintage? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters leads with about 1.8M estimated downloads vs 771K for ism: Retro Camera & Vintage - a 2.3× gap. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. ism: Retro Camera & Vintage's App Store downloads are estimated from 10K ratings.
Are Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and ism: Retro Camera & Vintage in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and ism: Retro Camera & Vintage offer? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters: IAP range 3 tiers detected. ism: Retro Camera & Vintage: IAP range 9 tiers detected. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; ism: Retro Camera & Vintage runs "Subscription (~$0.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or ism: Retro Camera & Vintage? v
ism: Retro Camera & Vintage edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters 16K ratings, ism: Retro Camera & Vintage 10K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs ism: Retro Camera & Vintage revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $180.0K for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and $6.6K for ism: Retro Camera & Vintage are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or ism: Retro Camera & Vintage to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.