Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs Shots: AI Photo Video Creator
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
Spark Dynamic
App Store
$179.9K/mo
~$2.16M/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
Shots: AI Photo Video Creator
DeePix AI
App Store
$140.7K/mo
~$1.69M/yr · 642K installs
Revenue winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+28% vs other
Installs winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+182% vs other
MAU winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+177% vs other
Rating winner
Shots: AI Photo Video Creator wins
+5% vs other
Why Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aggressive pricing. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $21.68/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters has ~1.8M lifetime installs vs Shots: AI Photo Video Creator's ~642K - 2.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
vs
Shots: AI Photo Video Creator
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$179.9K
◀
$140.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.16M
◀
$1.69M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
◀
642K
Monthly active users (est.)?
557K
◀
201K
App Store rating
4.35★
▶
4.57★
Total ratings
16K
◀
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$21.68
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 7, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 98.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 3.0.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 4, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 20, 2026
- File size
- 103.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.6.8
- Languages
- English, French, German, Portuguese, Turkish
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters trajectory
Shots: AI Photo Video Creator trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Shots: AI Photo Video Creator? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns about $179.9K per month, while Shots: AI Photo Video Creator earns about $140.7K. That is a 1.3× revenue gap (~$39.2K more per month for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters). Annual revenue: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters ≈ $2.16M/year, Shots: AI Photo Video Creator ≈ $1.69M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Shots: AI Photo Video Creator? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters leads with about 1.8M estimated downloads vs 642K for Shots: AI Photo Video Creator - a 2.8× gap. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Shots: AI Photo Video Creator's App Store downloads are estimated from 8K ratings.
Are Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and Shots: AI Photo Video Creator in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and Shots: AI Photo Video Creator offer? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Shots: AI Photo Video Creator: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; Shots: AI Photo Video Creator runs "Subscription (~$21.68/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Shots: AI Photo Video Creator? v
Shots: AI Photo Video Creator edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters 16K ratings, Shots: AI Photo Video Creator 8K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs Shots: AI Photo Video Creator revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $179.9K for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and $140.7K for Shots: AI Photo Video Creator are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Shots: AI Photo Video Creator to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.