Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.60M/mo
~$19.15M/yr · 16.0M installs
VS
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor
Prequel Inc.
App Store
$20.1K/mo
~$240.7K/yr · 1.6M installs
Revenue winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+7858% vs other
Installs winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+909% vs other
MAU winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+667% vs other
Rating winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+3% vs other
Why Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns roughly 80× more per month than Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor - $1.60M vs $20.1K.
- Premium pricing. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera charges $12.99/mo vs Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor's $1.25/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera has ~16.0M lifetime installs vs Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor's ~1.6M - 10.1× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs 10 IAP tiers vs 6 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
vs
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.60M
◀
$20.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$19.15M
◀
$240.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.0M
◀
1.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.8M
◀
496K
App Store rating
4.75★
◀
4.59★
Total ratings
107K
◀
14K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
◀
$1.25
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
6 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2018
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 138.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.17.1
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 25, 2023
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- 257.0 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.41.0
- Languages
- English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese +7 more
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $1.60M per month, while Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor earns about $20.1K. That is a 79.6× revenue gap (~$1.58M more per month for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera). Annual revenue: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $19.15M/year, Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor ≈ $240.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera leads with about 16.0M estimated downloads vs 1.6M for Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor - a 10.1× gap. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 107K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings.
Are Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor offer? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor runs "Subscription (~$1.25/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 107K ratings, Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor 14K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.60M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and $20.1K for Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.