Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor vs Web Video Cast | Browser to TV

Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor

Prequel Inc.
App Store
$22.0K/mo
~$264.0K/yr · 1.7M installs
VS

Web Video Cast | Browser to TV

InstantBits Inc
App Store
$317.0K/mo
~$3.80M/yr · 7.7M installs
Revenue winner Web Video Cast | Browser to TV wins +1341% vs other
Installs winner Web Video Cast | Browser to TV wins +344% vs other
MAU winner Web Video Cast | Browser to TV wins +351% vs other
Rating winner Web Video Cast | Browser to TV wins +5% vs other

Why Web Video Cast | Browser to TV is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Web Video Cast | Browser to TV earns roughly 14× more per month than Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor - $317.0K vs $22.0K.
  2. Premium pricing. Web Video Cast | Browser to TV charges $3.99/mo vs Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor's $1.25/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Web Video Cast | Browser to TV has ~7.7M lifetime installs vs Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor's ~1.7M - 4.4× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Web Video Cast | Browser to TV report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor
vs
Web Video Cast | Browser to TV
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$22.0K
$317.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$264.0K
$3.80M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.7M
7.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
545K
2.5M
App Store rating
4.61★
4.82★
Total ratings
16K
70K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.25
$3.99
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
1 tiers

Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor

Prequel Inc.
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Oct 25, 2023
Last updated
Jul 2, 2026
File size
267.7 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
1.44.0
Languages
English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese +7 more
View full Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor report →

Web Video Cast | Browser to TV

InstantBits Inc
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Nov 19, 2018
Last updated
Jun 16, 2026
File size
219.6 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
3.3
Languages
AF, Arabic, Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech +28 more
View full Web Video Cast | Browser to TV report →

Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Web Video Cast | Browser to TV trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor or Web Video Cast | Browser to TV? v
Web Video Cast | Browser to TV earns about $317.0K per month, while Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor earns about $22.0K. That is a 14.4× revenue gap (~$295.0K more per month for Web Video Cast | Browser to TV). Annual revenue: Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor ≈ $264.0K/year, Web Video Cast | Browser to TV ≈ $3.80M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor or Web Video Cast | Browser to TV? v
Web Video Cast | Browser to TV leads with about 7.7M estimated downloads vs 1.7M for Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor - a 4.4× gap. Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Web Video Cast | Browser to TV's App Store downloads are estimated from 70K ratings.
Are Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor and Web Video Cast | Browser to TV in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor and Web Video Cast | Browser to TV offer? v
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Web Video Cast | Browser to TV: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor runs a "Subscription (~$1.25/mo)" monetization model; Web Video Cast | Browser to TV runs "Subscription (~$3.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor or Web Video Cast | Browser to TV? v
Web Video Cast | Browser to TV edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor 16K ratings, Web Video Cast | Browser to TV 70K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor vs Web Video Cast | Browser to TV revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $22.0K for Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor and $317.0K for Web Video Cast | Browser to TV are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor or Web Video Cast | Browser to TV to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.