Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor vs RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor
Prequel Inc.
App Store
$20.1K/mo
~$240.7K/yr · 1.6M installs
VS
RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera
BrainCake Inc.
App Store
$202.2K/mo
~$2.43M/yr · 1.5M installs
Revenue winner
RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera wins
+908% vs other
Installs winner
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor wins
+4% vs other
MAU winner
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor wins
+58% vs other
Rating winner
RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera wins
+2% vs other
Why RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera earns roughly 10× more per month than Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor - $202.2K vs $20.1K.
- Premium pricing. RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera charges $19.99/mo vs Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor's $1.25/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$20.1K
▶
$202.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$240.7K
▶
$2.43M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.6M
◀
1.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
496K
◀
313K
App Store rating
4.59★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
14K
◀
14K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.25
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 25, 2023
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- 257.0 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.41.0
- Languages
- English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese +7 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 4, 2008
- Last updated
- Feb 1, 2022
- File size
- 124.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.1.2
- Languages
- English
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor trajectory
RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor or RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera? v
RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera earns about $202.2K per month, while Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor earns about $20.1K. That is a 10.1× revenue gap (~$182.1K more per month for RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera). Annual revenue: Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor ≈ $240.7K/year, RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera ≈ $2.43M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor or RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera? v
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor leads with about 1.6M estimated downloads vs 1.5M for RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera - a 1.0× gap. Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings.
Are Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor and RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor and RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera offer? v
Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor: IAP range 6 tiers detected. RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor runs a "Subscription (~$1.25/mo)" monetization model; RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor or RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera? v
RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor 14K ratings, RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera 14K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor vs RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $20.1K for Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor and $202.2K for RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Esti: Aesthetic Photo Editor or RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
