GI and glycemic load vs Home Workout - No Equipment

GI and glycemic load

Sipione
Google Play
$46/mo
~$549/yr · 3K installs
VS

Home Workout - No Equipment

Leap Fitness Group
Google Play
$6.17M/mo
~$74.03M/yr · 297.0M installs
Revenue winner Home Workout - No Equipment wins +13410993% vs other
Installs winner Home Workout - No Equipment wins +11608848% vs other
MAU winner Home Workout - No Equipment wins +2009141% vs other
Rating winner Home Workout - No Equipment wins +486% vs other

Why Home Workout - No Equipment is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Home Workout - No Equipment earns roughly 134111× more per month than GI and glycemic load - $6.17M vs $46.
  2. Subscription model. Home Workout - No Equipment runs a $14.47/mo subscription that compounds; GI and glycemic load relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Home Workout - No Equipment has ~297.0M lifetime installs vs GI and glycemic load's ~3K - 116089.5× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Home Workout - No Equipment sits at 4.86★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Home Workout - No Equipment report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

GI and glycemic load
vs
Home Workout - No Equipment
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$46
▶
$6.17M
Annual revenue (est.)
$549
▶
$74.03M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
297.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
532.064
▶
10.7M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
0
▶
4.0M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$14.47
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

GI and glycemic load

Sipione
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
USD1.49
Released
Sep 18, 2016
Last updated
Sep 30, 2024
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.0.10
Languages
-
View full GI and glycemic load report →

Home Workout - No Equipment

Leap Fitness Group
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Nov 8, 2017
Last updated
Jun 15, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.7.5
Languages
-
View full Home Workout - No Equipment report →

GI and glycemic load trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Home Workout - No Equipment trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

GI and glycemic load Play Store page →Home Workout - No Equipment Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Cal AI Calorie Tracker iOS vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidCalorie Counter Mynetdiary Android vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidCal AI Food Calorie Tracker Android vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidGi and Glycemic Load Android vs Myfitnesspal Calorie Counter AndroidGi and Glycemic Load Android vs Google Fit Activity Tracking AndroidFitbit Health Fitness iOS vs Gi and Glycemic Load Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, GI and glycemic load or Home Workout - No Equipment? v
Home Workout - No Equipment earns about $6.17M per month, while GI and glycemic load earns about $46. That is a 134110.9× revenue gap (~$6.17M more per month for Home Workout - No Equipment). Annual revenue: GI and glycemic load ≈ $549/year, Home Workout - No Equipment ≈ $74.03M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, GI and glycemic load or Home Workout - No Equipment? v
Home Workout - No Equipment leads with about 297.0M estimated downloads vs 3K for GI and glycemic load - a 116089.5× gap. GI and glycemic load reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. Home Workout - No Equipment reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are GI and glycemic load and Home Workout - No Equipment in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do GI and glycemic load and Home Workout - No Equipment offer? v
GI and glycemic load: no IAP detected on the public listing. Home Workout - No Equipment: IAP range $2.99 - $69.99 per item. GI and glycemic load runs a "Paid app ($1.49)" monetization model; Home Workout - No Equipment runs "Subscription (~$14.47/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, GI and glycemic load or Home Workout - No Equipment? v
Home Workout - No Equipment edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: GI and glycemic load 0 ratings, Home Workout - No Equipment 67K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these GI and glycemic load vs Home Workout - No Equipment revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $46 for GI and glycemic load and $6.17M for Home Workout - No Equipment are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare GI and glycemic load or Home Workout - No Equipment to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.