GI and glycemic load vs MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter

GI and glycemic load

Sipione
Google Play
$46/mo
~$546/yr · 3K installs
VS

MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter

MyFitnessPal, Inc.
Google Play
$3.02M/mo
~$36.26M/yr · 134.0M installs
Revenue winner MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins +6568502% vs other
Installs winner MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins +5260269% vs other
MAU winner MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins +1011509% vs other
Rating winner MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins +439% vs other

Why MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter earns roughly 65686× more per month than GI and glycemic load - $3.02M vs $46.
  2. Subscription model. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter runs a $9.95/mo subscription that compounds; GI and glycemic load relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter has ~134.0M lifetime installs vs GI and glycemic load's ~3K - 52603.7× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter sits at 4.39★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

GI and glycemic load
vs
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$46
▶
$3.02M
Annual revenue (est.)
$546
▶
$36.26M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
134.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
529.776
▶
5.4M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.39★
Total ratings
0
▶
2.9M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.95
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

GI and glycemic load

Sipione
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
USD1.49
Released
Sep 18, 2016
Last updated
Sep 30, 2024
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.0.10
Languages
-
View full GI and glycemic load report →

MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter

MyFitnessPal, Inc.
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 26, 2010
Last updated
May 1, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter report →

GI and glycemic load trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

GI and glycemic load Play Store page →MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Cal AI Calorie Tracker iOS vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidCalorie Counter Mynetdiary Android vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidCal AI Food Calorie Tracker Android vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidGi and Glycemic Load Android vs Lasta Your Wellness Coach AndroidFiton Workouts Amp Fitness Plans Android vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidFitbit Health Fitness iOS vs Gi and Glycemic Load Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, GI and glycemic load or MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter earns about $3.02M per month, while GI and glycemic load earns about $46. That is a 65686.0× revenue gap (~$3.02M more per month for MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: GI and glycemic load ≈ $546/year, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter ≈ $36.26M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, GI and glycemic load or MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter leads with about 134.0M estimated downloads vs 3K for GI and glycemic load - a 52603.7× gap. GI and glycemic load reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are GI and glycemic load and MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do GI and glycemic load and MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter offer? v
GI and glycemic load: no IAP detected on the public listing. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $99.99 per item. GI and glycemic load runs a "Paid app ($1.49)" monetization model; MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$9.95/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, GI and glycemic load or MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter? v
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.4 stars). Rating volume: GI and glycemic load 0 ratings, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter 454K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these GI and glycemic load vs MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $46 for GI and glycemic load and $3.02M for MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare GI and glycemic load or MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.