GI and glycemic load vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker

GI and glycemic load

Sipione
Google Play
$46/mo
~$546/yr · 3K installs
VS

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker

Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$95.2K/mo
~$1.14M/yr · 1.3M installs
Revenue winner MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins +206935% vs other
Installs winner MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins +50980% vs other
MAU winner MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins +31579% vs other
Rating winner MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins +467% vs other

Why MacroFactor - Macro Tracker is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns roughly 2070× more per month than GI and glycemic load - $95.2K vs $46.
  2. Subscription model. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs a $11.99/mo subscription that compounds; GI and glycemic load relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker has ~1.3M lifetime installs vs GI and glycemic load's ~3K - 510.8× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker sits at 4.67★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MacroFactor - Macro Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

GI and glycemic load
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$46
▶
$95.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$546
▶
$1.14M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
1.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
529.776
▶
168K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
0
▶
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

GI and glycemic load

Sipione
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
USD1.49
Released
Sep 18, 2016
Last updated
Sep 30, 2024
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.0.10
Languages
-
View full GI and glycemic load report →

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker

Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Sep 14, 2021
Last updated
May 9, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone 10+
Version
5.7.6
Languages
-
View full MacroFactor - Macro Tracker report →

GI and glycemic load trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

GI and glycemic load Play Store page →MacroFactor - Macro Tracker Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Cal AI Calorie Tracker iOS vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidCalorie Counter Mynetdiary Android vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidCal AI Food Calorie Tracker Android vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidFoodvisor AI Calorie Counter Android vs Gi and Glycemic Load AndroidGi and Glycemic Load Android vs Myfitnesspal Calorie Counter AndroidBettersleep Sleep Tracker Android vs Gi and Glycemic Load Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, GI and glycemic load or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $95.2K per month, while GI and glycemic load earns about $46. That is a 2070.3× revenue gap (~$95.2K more per month for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker). Annual revenue: GI and glycemic load ≈ $546/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.14M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, GI and glycemic load or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker leads with about 1.3M estimated downloads vs 3K for GI and glycemic load - a 510.8× gap. GI and glycemic load reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are GI and glycemic load and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do GI and glycemic load and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
GI and glycemic load: no IAP detected on the public listing. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. GI and glycemic load runs a "Paid app ($1.49)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, GI and glycemic load or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.7 stars). Rating volume: GI and glycemic load 0 ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these GI and glycemic load vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $46 for GI and glycemic load and $95.2K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare GI and glycemic load or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.