VSCO: Photo & Video Editor vs YouTube

VSCO: Photo & Video Editor

Visual Supply Company
App Store
$1.84M/mo
~$22.14M/yr · 41.3M installs
VS

YouTube

Google
App Store
$381.33M/mo
~$4.58B/yr · 5.0B installs
Revenue winner YouTube wins +20573% vs other
Installs winner YouTube wins +11995% vs other
MAU winner YouTube wins +27458% vs other
Rating winner VSCO: Photo & Video Editor wins +1% vs other

Why YouTube is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. YouTube earns roughly 207× more per month than VSCO: Photo & Video Editor - $381.33M vs $1.84M.
  2. Premium pricing. YouTube charges $20.99/mo vs VSCO: Photo & Video Editor's $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. YouTube has ~5.0B lifetime installs vs VSCO: Photo & Video Editor's ~41.3M - 120.9× the funnel top.
  4. Charts placement. YouTube ranks #2 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full YouTube report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

VSCO: Photo & Video Editor
vs
YouTube
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.84M
$381.33M
Annual revenue (est.)
$22.14M
$4.58B
Lifetime installs (est.)
41.3M
5.0B
Monthly active users (est.)?
9.8M
2.7B
App Store rating
4.69★
4.67★
Total ratings
276K
47.9M
US grossing rank
-
#2
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
$20.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
=
4 tiers

VSCO: Photo & Video Editor

Visual Supply Company
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Jun 6, 2013
Last updated
Jul 3, 2026
File size
316.5 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
461.5.1
Languages
Dutch, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian +10 more
View full VSCO: Photo & Video Editor report →

YouTube

Google
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Sep 11, 2012
Last updated
Jun 28, 2026
File size
352.2 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
21.26.4
Languages
AF, SQ, AM, Arabic, HY, AZ +66 more
View full YouTube report →

VSCO: Photo & Video Editor trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

YouTube trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, VSCO: Photo & Video Editor or YouTube? v
YouTube earns about $381.33M per month, while VSCO: Photo & Video Editor earns about $1.84M. That is a 206.7× revenue gap (~$379.48M more per month for YouTube). Annual revenue: VSCO: Photo & Video Editor ≈ $22.14M/year, YouTube ≈ $4.58B/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, VSCO: Photo & Video Editor or YouTube? v
YouTube leads with about 5.0B estimated downloads vs 41.3M for VSCO: Photo & Video Editor - a 120.9× gap. VSCO: Photo & Video Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 276K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. YouTube's App Store downloads are estimated from 47.9M ratings.
Are VSCO: Photo & Video Editor and YouTube in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do VSCO: Photo & Video Editor and YouTube offer? v
VSCO: Photo & Video Editor: IAP range 4 tiers detected. YouTube: IAP range 4 tiers detected. VSCO: Photo & Video Editor runs a "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)" monetization model; YouTube runs "Subscription (~$20.99/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #2". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, VSCO: Photo & Video Editor or YouTube? v
VSCO: Photo & Video Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: VSCO: Photo & Video Editor 276K ratings, YouTube 47.9M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these VSCO: Photo & Video Editor vs YouTube revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.84M for VSCO: Photo & Video Editor and $381.33M for YouTube are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare VSCO: Photo & Video Editor or YouTube to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.