Fitbit vs FunDo Pro

Fitbit

Google LLC
Google Play
$4.66M/mo
~$55.96M/yr · 253.3M installs
VS

FunDo Pro

Shenzhen Fen Yun Technology Co.,Ltd
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 9.4M installs
Revenue winner Fitbit wins +466297000% vs other
Installs winner Fitbit wins +2602% vs other
MAU winner Fitbit wins +583% vs other
Rating winner Fitbit wins +49% vs other

Why Fitbit is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fitbit earns roughly 4662970× more per month than FunDo Pro - $4.66M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Fitbit runs a $28.27/mo subscription that compounds; FunDo Pro relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Fitbit has ~253.3M lifetime installs vs FunDo Pro's ~9.4M - 27.0× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Fitbit sits at 4.15★ vs 2.79★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fitbit
vs
FunDo Pro
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$4.66M
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$55.96M
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
253.3M
9.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
6.1M
890K
App Store rating
4.15★
2.79★
Total ratings
1.3M
67K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$28.27
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Fitbit

Google LLC
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Mar 16, 2012
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Fitbit report →

FunDo Pro

Shenzhen Fen Yun Technology Co.,Ltd
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jun 12, 2017
Last updated
Jul 31, 2024
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.8.15
Languages
-
View full FunDo Pro report →

Fitbit trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FunDo Pro trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fitbit or FunDo Pro? v
Fitbit earns about $4.66M per month, while FunDo Pro earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$4.66M more per month for Fitbit). Annual revenue: Fitbit ≈ $55.96M/year, FunDo Pro ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit or FunDo Pro? v
Fitbit leads with about 253.3M estimated downloads vs 9.4M for FunDo Pro - a 27.0× gap. Fitbit reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. FunDo Pro reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit and FunDo Pro in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit and FunDo Pro offer? v
Fitbit: IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. FunDo Pro: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fitbit runs a "Subscription (~$28.27/mo, wellness)" monetization model; FunDo Pro runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit or FunDo Pro? v
Fitbit edges ahead with ★ 4.1 vs ★ 2.8 (gap of 1.4 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit 245K ratings, FunDo Pro 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit vs FunDo Pro revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $4.66M for Fitbit and $0 for FunDo Pro are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit or FunDo Pro to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.